Lessons Learnt
From The Devastating Earthquakes
(The Next Move)
Published in The Kathmandu Post, June 7, 2015)
From The Devastating Earthquakes
(The Next Move)
Published in The Kathmandu Post, June 7, 2015)
Sandhya Regmi
sandhyaregmi2000@gmail.com
The devastating earthquakes of 25th
April and 12th May and its continuing aftershocks—that destroyed the
fabric of the nation by killing and injuring tens of thousands, traumatizing millions,
destroying property worth billions—was unavoidable. But its consequences were,
only if we were prepared for it. And to the extent we were prepared for it.
The earthquake has stark-naked our
ill preparedness. This, despite our knowledge that an unscheduled visit by the unwelcome
guest was unavoidable, and despite the decades-long drum-beats on the preparation
from the state machineries and non-state persons. At the state level,
requirement to draft stringent building codes and their enforcement remained
not far placed from the fairy tale. The concept of alternative international
airports and other transport routes and systems remained far-fetched dreams.
But why was even the country’s only air-entry point repeatedly shut down, when
its service was badly wanted? Wasn’t it too built to the standard? How about
residences’ whereabouts, didn’t the state even consider it necessary to
maintain residence-log that could have helped find the number of missing
victims? Even at heart of the capital, the state’s mass-communication system
failed its robustness test, at the time when people needed it most. In absence
of the state-communication, people in the camp were compelled to rely on
rumors.
The quake has served to warn our
politicians, planners, rule-makers, and rulers that, the necessity of the
country’s physical infrastructures and their standard must stand taller than
the usually professed internal-rate-of-return doctrine. The state needs to
freshly work on the requirements and standards of additional international and
national level airports, road transports, including their feasible
implementation scheme and schedule. Similarly, the country needs fresh review
on its building codes and implementation scheme for each class of building
structure: airport infrastructure, hospital, national heritage, school, public
building, commercial building, and residential building.
The consequences of the ugly guest’s
nasty acts have compelled to put ourselves to trial on the stage of our civilization.
Far from indulging into lootings and vandalism, the quake affected people
themselves helped each other, from bare-hand-scratching of rubbles and sharing
their tent-and-food to providing security to themselves. In the aftermath, people from across the country unified as one—regardless
of their geographical location, cast, class, colour, or religion—standing taller
than the artificial divides devised by the politicians. In the same basket, the
event has offered our politicians an opportunity to introspect worthwhileness
of their dragging the country for years in the name of federating the state to
their likes.
The earthquake has provided an
opportunity to hold the best-placed organization and the best way forward to
deal with such aftermaths. Without pausing a second, the first-order salute
goes to the heroes of our national army
and police force who, for the search and rescue operation, worked
days-and-nights sacrificing their own life. The instant responses from our
neighboring states, and the helps and solidarity poured from across the world
bears on us an insight to prepare ourselves to respond in the event of future
mega-disasters, both inside and outside the state boundary. This calls for our
national army to align and focus more on joint-search-rescue drills with the
state-security forces of our neighboring countries. For, at the time of such
disasters, we will need their help, and their people will need ours.
Similarly, the country needs a
standing centralized body capable of efficiently handling and coordinating in
such emergency situations. The body should be capable of estimating the nature
and degree of assistance needed at each specific location to cope with specific
disaster situation, and capable of coordinating and negotiating the
requirements with non-state organizations and agencies operating inside and
outside the country. Such arrangement would help pinpoint the precise requirements
in the mind of perspective donors, help reduce duplication, redundancy, and
wastage of resources, and would serve the core purpose at the quickest possible
time.
Despite its mighty act, this
black disaster has failed to fail us, for we may have fallen down but not yet
out. Arguably, the most beautiful sight out of the rubble is the light
radiating out of the survivors’ face. Their refusal to be defeated. Their
spirit to be alive. Their determination to stitch the broken hearts, to re-work
on the shattered dreams, and to move forward. Their energy to reconstitute and
rebuild their homes, schools, and the country.
But in fueling that rebuilding
task, they would need helping hands. The state has acknowledged and 127
nations’ solidarity has testified that. To assist in the rebuilding process,
several donors have already raised their hands, while others are in the
process. But there is an apparent confusion or uneasiness between the state and
the donor agencies on the channel and mechanism to streamline the assistance. The
government must show statesmanship by working seriously to find ways that are
consistent with the national interest, and are transparent and accountable, yet
flexible enough for sides to be part of the process.
This is a great chance for
everyone to participate in the nation-rebuilding process. A change for leaders
from all walks of life: individuals, students, professionals, business houses,
and non-profit organizations; medical leaders like Dr. Govinda KC and Dr. Bhagawan
Koirala, professional writers like Professor Abhi Subedi. Yet the country’s
politicians are best positioned to tap the opportunity, for people have given
them the duty and power to lead the nation. So, it is the golden opportunity for
the politicians to bury their differences and to work unitedly, and secure
their place in the glorious history of the nation building. Yet they have another
choice. They may opt for abusing and misusing the situation and focus on
fulfilling their vested interests. But they must not forget that people too
will have their choice.
No comments:
Post a Comment